| Legal Authorities - Chapter 10 | ||
|
| ||
|
A Union Representative needs to be aware of the Legal Authorities involved in representing bargaining unit employees. It is important to understand how the various authorities relate to each other, and how they enable or restrict the Union Representative's actions. This chapter will cover the following authorities:
| ||
Federal Laws
The
Federal Service Labor Management Relations Statute (FSLMRS)
The primary legal
reference for federal union matters is the Federal Service
Labor-Management Relations Statute (FSLMRS), codified at 5 U.S.C. § 71
(Title 5, United States Code, Chapter 71).
It is sometimes referred to as simply, “the Statute”.
The FSLMRS is the statutory basis for the Federal Labor Relations
Authority (FLRA) and the Federal Service Impasses Panel.
It includes such topics as Management Rights, Representation
Rights, the duty to bargain in good faith, and standards of conduct for
labor organizations. Actions that can be
taken under this statute include: an Unfair Labor Practice Charge (ULP),
an Exception to an Arbitrator’s Award, a Negotiability Appeal, and a
Request for Information. The
Union’s collective bargaining agreement (“contract”) with Management
and the negotiated grievance procedure originate from requirements in the
FSLMRS. http://www.flra.gov/statutes/fslmrs/fslmrs.html Other
Federal Laws
As
a Union Steward, it is necessary to be familiar with other laws that
affect the federal workplace. The
Unites States Code is the body of laws passed by Congress that govern our
nation: United States
Code. Many of the laws
relating to federal employees are found in Title 5 – Government
Organization and Employees (such as the FSLMRS, listed above), but
there are other important laws in other titles.
For example, Title 29 – Labor includes the Fair Labor
Standards Act (FLSA). Some of
the laws you will need to be familiar with include the following:
| ||
Federal Regulations
The
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) The Code of Federal
Regulations are the implementing rules promulgated by Federal agencies in
order to execute laws: http://www.gpoaccess.gov/cfr/index.html The
Foreign Affairs Manual (FAM) The Foreign Affairs
Manual contains the regulations that implement the policies and procedures at
the Department of State. One
important concept to keep in mind is that where this is a conflict between
the FAM and the collective bargaining agreement (CBA or contract), the
language in the CBA rules. Personnel
rules are found in the 3 FAM. http://foia.state.gov/REGS/Search.asp http://foia.state.gov/REGS/fams.asp?level=2&id=3&fam=0
| ||
Legal Rulings
Court
Decisions Disputes
between labor and Management sometimes have to be settled by the courts.
Only federal courts (District Courts, Appeals Courts, and the
Supreme Court) have jurisdiction over these matters.
Disagreements reach the courts either through lawsuits or through
appeals of final decisions issued by the Federal Labor Relations Authority
(FLRA). For example, in 1999
the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in National Federation
of Federal Employees v. United States Dep't of the Interior, 526
U.S. 86 (1999), reviewing United States Dep't of the Interior v.
FLRA , 132
F.3d 157 (4th Cir. 1997), on a case involving mid-term bargaining.
According to the FLRA’s website: The Supreme Court remanded the Fourth Circuit's
decision in which the Fourth Circuit held that the Agency had no
obligation to bargain endterm over a collective bargaining agreement
provision to permit negotiations over Union-initiated midterm proposals.
Regarding the issue of midterm bargaining, the Supreme Court concluded
that the Authority's interpretation of the Statute is entitled to
deference and vacated the Fourth Circuit's decision in United States
Dep't of the Interior v. FLRA, 132
F.3d 157 (4th Cir. 1997), that an agency is not obligated to
bargain over a proposal, offered during term negotiations, that would
require it to engage in union-initiated midterm bargaining. The Court
rejected the Fourth Circuit's premise that the Statute imposes no
obligation on Federal agencies to bargain midterm and held that the
Statute was "sufficiently ambiguous" as to require deference to
the Authority's interpretation. The Court stated that it was up to the
Authority to determine "whether, when, where, and what sort of
midterm bargaining is required." The Court remanded the case to the
Fourth Circuit, which, in turn, remanded the case to the Authority for
proceedings consistent with the opinion of the Supreme Court. FLRA
Rulings Most
disputes between the Union and Management do not reach the courts; instead
they are settled by the Federal Labor Relations Authority (FLRA).
The FLRA has 5 responsibilities: 1) resolving Unfair Labor Practice
(ULP) charges – a charge that either an Agency or occasionally a Union
has violated 5 U.S.C. 7116; 2) determining appropriate units of bargaining
unit employees (including determining whether a position that Management
says is outside the unit should be included or excluded from the unit); 3)
deciding appeals – called “exceptions” – of decisions/awards
issued by arbitrators; 4) deciding negotiability appeals – whether there
is a legal obligation to bargain over an issue; and 5) resolving
bargaining impasses – making a final decision when a Union and an Agency
cannot reach agreement through negotiations.
The
last type of case – bargaining
impasses – is handled by the Federal Service Impasses Panel (FSIP)
and involves a decision on the merits of a proposal, not legal matters,
and decisions are not considered universally precedent-setting.
Decisions
on negotiability appeals are
legal rulings on whether Management has an obligation to bargain over a
Union’s proposal on a subject, and often revolve around whether or not
the proposal infringes on Management Rights under 5 U.S.C. 7106. These cases are decided by a 3-member panel simply called,
“The Authority”. NFFE
Local 1998 has only filed one Negotiability Appeal – 60
FLRA No. 34 – which involved Management’s unilateral termination
of some compressed work schedules. The
Authority ruled for the Union and ordered Management to bargain over the
Union’s proposals, including “maintain the status quo”.
Unfair
Labor Practice charges are filed at one of the seven regional offices of the FLRA and
they are decided, after an investigation, by that particular FLRA Regional
Director. NFFE Local 1998 has
filed ULP’s on: failure to timely deduct Union dues, changes in
performance standards, discrimination based on protected Union activity,
and changes in working conditions for which there was no notice or
opportunity to bargain. When
a union files a grievance, and that grievance is not settled via the
negotiated grievance procedure, the case can be brought to an arbitrator
who is an independent decision maker and judge who decides the merits of
the case. When either side
disagrees with the legal basis for the decision, an Exception to an
Arbitrator’s Award can be filed with the FLRA.
In 1994, when NFFE Local 1998 won an arbitration case on the very
initial use of contractors (non-government workers) at the National
Passport Center (NPC), Management filed an exception to that award with
the FLRA and eventually prevailed. The
FLRA is also charged with determining what groups of employees are
properly organized into one bargaining unit – for the purposes of being
represented by a labor organization – and also determining which
employees may, and which may not, be considered “bargaining unit
employees” (i.e., eligible for union membership and union
representation). NFFE Local
1998 had its initial Certificate of Representation issued by the
FLRA on October 19, 1981 and also had to subsequent certificates issued to
clarify the bargaining unit. Whenever
Management claims that a staff member cannot be considered a bargaining
unit employee, the Union can file a Clarification of Unit with the
FLRA. The FLRA has the sole
authority to answer this question, and it is not subject to either a
grievance or to negotiations. | ||
|
Collective
Bargaining Agreement (CBA) – the “contract” The
Collective Bargaining Agreement
The
FSLMRS calls for Management and the Union to collectively bargain over
workplace issues and to produce a collective bargaining agreement.
This is also called the “contract”, “CBA”, “Union
Agreement”, or simply the “Agreement”.
Violations of the contract can be grieved through the negotiated
grievance procedure, which is part of the contract itself.
The current contract between NFFE Local 1998 and Passport Services
went into effect on July 3, 2001. Amendments
to the Agreement
The
contract can be amended by mutual agreement of both parties.
The contract between NFFE Local 1998 and Passport Services was
amended on the following dates:
Local
Agreements Local office Management and the Senior Steward and
Steward(s) for each office may negotiate local agreements on a number of
issues, under the authority of either Article 12 or Article 4 of the
contract. These include work
schedules, food and drink policies, desk arrangements, headphone policies,
dress code, and other issues. Violations
of these local agreements are subject to grievances just like violations
of the contract itself. Unilateral
changes by Management to local agreements are subject to either grievances
or Unfair Labor Practice charges. | ||
|
Past Practice Past practices are in essence unwritten rules or arrangements regarding working conditions that have been developed and used over time. Per federal labor law rulings and the negotiated agreement, these practices are considered to be part of the negotiated agreement even though they are not specifically included. An example would be the use of headphones to listen to music while working. If this practice has been going on with the knowledge and (implicit) permission of Management, then Management cannot unilaterally terminate or change this policy. A violation of a past practice can be grieved, and changing a past practice must be done through means identical to changing a negotiated agreement (e.g., collective bargaining). According to Article 6, Section 23 of the Agreement: Where
established working conditions or past practices relating to conditions of
employment exist that are not in conflict with this agreement or its
amendments, the conditions or practices may be continued until either
party pursues and accomplishes changes through procedures that conform to
legal and regulatory requirements. | ||
|
|